Abortion

Americans United for Life Commends U.S. House for Voting to Protect Women and Unborn Children from the Dangers of Late-Term Abortion Procedures

Wednesday, June 19th, 2013

“I applaud the members of the U.S. House for respecting the viewpoint of the vast majority of women, who do not support such gruesome abortion procedures performed against fully formed infants,”
said AUL’s Dr. Charmaine Yoest.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (06-18-13) – Americans United for Life President and CEO Dr. Charmaine Yoest commended the U.S. House for voting to limit abortion after a child reaches 20 weeks – or about 6 months – of pregnancy. “Even though the bill did not contain explicit findings regarding the adverse effects of late term abortion on maternal health, there is no dispute that the health risks of abortion to women greatly increases with late-term procedures and the pain endured by the child in the womb is clearly horrific,” said Dr. Yoest. “I applaud the members of the U.S. House for respecting the viewpoint of the vast majority of women, who do not support such gruesome abortion procedures performed against fully formed infants.”

Recent polls reveal that 63% of all Americans—including 70% of women—support a 20-week limitation on abortion. The House voted 228 to 196 in favor of H.R. 1797, which would limit abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

“This bill both safeguards unborn children and takes an important and necessary step toward protecting the health and safety of women from the dangers inherent in abortion,” said Dr. Yoest, who noted that a woman seeking an abortion at 20 weeks is 35 times more likely to die from abortion than she was in the first trimester. At 21 weeks or more, she is 91 times more likely to die from abortion than she was in the first trimester.

The realities of the health risk of abortion to women is even acknowledged by the pro-abortion research organization, The Guttmacher Institute, which notes: “The risk of death associated with abortion increases with the length of pregnancy, from one death for every one million abortions at or before eight weeks to one per 29,000 at 16–20 weeks—and one per 11,000 at 21 or more weeks.”

“Now the members of the U.S. Senate should stand with the women of America protect women and unborn, infant children, from dangerous, later-term procedures,” said Dr. Yoest.

For more on the health risks of abortion to women, click here.

Dr. Charmaine Yoest on MSNBC

Sunday, June 16th, 2013

Dr. Charmaine Yoest, president and CEO of AUL, was recently on MSNBC’s UP for a conversation on Arizona Republican Trent Franks’ recent comments on rape, the return of the “war on women,” and bills at the state and national level aimed at reducing the number of abortions.

AUL Expresses Disappointment that Indiana Abortion Providers Continue to Operate with Some Taxpayer Subsidies

Tuesday, May 28th, 2013

“Indiana lawmakers – and the people they represent – should have the right to decide whether their hard-earned tax dollars end up in the hands of the abortion industry,” said AUL’s Dr. Charmaine Yoest.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (05-28-2013) –The United States Supreme Court rejected an opportunity to review a lower court decision preventing Indiana from cutting off Medicaid funding from abortion providers. In the case, Indiana lawmakers prohibited federal and state taxpayer funding from going to entities, such as Planned Parenthood, that provide abortions. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held in Planned Parenthood v. Indiana that state lawmakers cannot prohibit otherwise-qualified abortion providers from receiving reimbursement through Medicaid, ostensibly for “family planning” and other services, because they perform abortions.

“The Court missed an opportunity to clarify, once and for all, that states may cut the abortion industry off from all sources of taxpayer funding,” observed Americans United for Life President and CEO Dr. Charmaine Yoest. “Big Abortion has no constitutional right to force Americans to support its deadly industry with tax dollars.”

But the case did offer a silver lining, noted Dr. Yoest. “While we are disappointed that the Supreme Court did not take this case, the Court’s decision allows one aspect of the Seventh Circuit’s ruling to stand: it is constitutional for states to prohibit non-Medicaid public funds from being awarded to abortion providers,” she noted.

However, the Seventh Circuit rejected Indiana’s legitimate justifications for denying Medicaid funding to entities that provide abortions.

“In fact, Indiana made a well-reasoned determination that bankrolling the abortion industry violates the state’s public policy, and abortion providers are, therefore, not qualified to receive taxpayer funds, including Medicaid funds” stated Yoest.

AUL has developed cutting-edge model legislation, including the Defunding the Abortion Industry and Advancing Women’s Health Act, to assist states with defunding abortion providers and protecting women and their unborn children in a manner similar to the Indiana law. For more information on this and other AUL model legislation found in Defending Life, click here.

AUL Condemns 9th Circuit Ruling Regarding Arizona Late-Term Abortion Law Designed to Protect Women’s Health from Abortion’s Dangerous Realities

Wednesday, May 22nd, 2013

“This terrible decision from the 9th Circuit ignores the growing body of evidence that late-term abortions are dangerous for women” noted AUL’s Dr. Charmaine Yoest. “And yet a woman receiving an abortion at 20 weeks is 35 times more likely to die than she was in the first trimester.”

WASHINGTON, D.C. (05-22-2013) – Ignoring the growing body of evidence detailing abortion’s harms to women, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down Arizona’s prohibition of abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy, despite the fact that the risks to maternal health dramatically increase with such later-term abortion procedures. The troubling ruling involved a unique piece of model legislation from Americans United for Life that limits abortion later in pregnancy because of the health risks of abortion for women, as well as the pain inflicted on the unborn infant during the abortion.

“Once again, we see unelected judges ignoring the troubling medical evidence about the impact of late-term abortions on women,” observed Americans United for Life President and CEO Dr. Charmaine Yoest. “Instead, such judges continue to act as a self-appointed and unelected ‘Abortion Control Board’ and insist on allowing unregulated, unmonitored and dangerous later-term procedures.”

In the faulty ruling, the Ninth Circuit three-judge panel claimed that no state can prohibit abortion before viability (around 23 to 24 weeks), regardless of whether later-term abortion substantially increases the mother’s risk of death. Most of the 195 nations in the world limit abortion between 12 and 20 weeks, in part because of the dangers of such later-term procedures. Only the United States, North Korea, China and Canada allow abortions through all 9 months of pregnancy, for any reason whatsoever (including sex-selection), and sometimes with taxpayer subsidies.

Dr. Yoest commented: “Two weeks ago, a jury of Americans in Philadelphia expressed their horror at late-term abortions; today, three judges said that late-term abortions must continue  despite the deliberative action of the Arizona legislature, the elected representatives of the people of the state.  This is an extreme disservice to the women of Arizona.”

“Substantial medical data—utilized even by the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute—demonstrates that a woman seeking an abortion in Arizona at 20 weeks is 35 times more likely to die from abortion than she was in the first trimester.  At 21 weeks or more, she is 91 times more likely to die from abortion than she was in the first trimester.  But these judges incorrectly decided that the ‘abortion right’ is so enshrined in Supreme Court precedent that states cannot even enact restrictions aimed at protecting maternal health.  The message is clear: abortion is more important than protecting women’s lives.”

In a concurring opinion, Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld indicated that his hands are tied by the “viability rule,” but noted that it is an “odd rule” because viability changes as medicine improves—meaning that there is no threshold rule for states to follow that can withstand the test of time.

The law was based in substantial part on AUL’s “Women’s Health Defense Act,” and AUL’s Senior Counsel Clarke Forsythe testified in the legislature on behalf of the bill.  AUL expects the state of Arizona to request that the U.S. Supreme Court review the case.  The 20-week prohibitions of abortion in several other states remain in effect.

For more information on AUL’s cutting-edge model legislation found in Defending Life, click here

Exposing Kermit Gosnell

Tuesday, May 21st, 2013

medialogos1.jpg

For the past several weeks, AUL’s office has been flooded with inquiries from media, legislators and the public following the horrific and gruesome details arising from the murder trial of Philadelphia late-term abortionist Kermit Gosnell.

With last week’s events behind us, and with a courageous conviction handed down by the jury, I want you to know that your AUL team has been a powerful voice in exposing Big Abortion, not just last week, but throughout the Gosnell trial and for decades before.

The following reflects only a handful of the outlets in which AUL was able to be your voice for life:

  • Dr. Charmaine Yoest, AUL President and CEO, appeared on FOX News’ Special Report with Bret Baier shortly after Gosnell’s guilty verdict was handed down to discuss the case’s important impact on the future of the abortion industry.
  • Dr. Yoest debated Ilyse Hogue, President of NARAL Pro-Choice America, on PBS NewsHour, while the trial was on-going, to expose Big Abortion’s hypocritical opposition to clinic regulations.
  • Jeanneane Maxon, AUL Vice President of External Affairs and Corporate Counsel, who witnessed parts of the trial first-hand, provided comment to ABC World News with Diane Sawyer following the verdict, which was the first coverage ABC provided to the Gosnell trial since it had begun 56 days prior.
  • Dr. Yoest was invited to FOX News to view and comment on President Obama’s speech at the annual Planned Parenthood convention, which occurred as the horrific and gruesome details of the Gosnell trial were being exposed.
  • Denise Burke, AUL’s Vice President of Legal Affairs, was featured in the New York Times calling for the enactment of abortion clinic regulations to prevent tragedies like Gosnell in the future.
  • Dr. Yoest was featured on FOX News discussing the potentially dangerous effects of the over-the-counter Plan B One-Step pill.
  • Jeanneane Maxon gave her eye-witness account of the trial on the Mike Huckabee Radio Show while America awaited a verdict.
  • Dr. Yoest was featured in the Washington Post responding to the expanded distribution of the “Morning-After” pill to minors over-the-counter.
  • Ms. Burke was published in the Washington Times with an op-ed responding to the Gosnell trial and calling for the enactment of abortion clinic regulations.

As a culture we are witnessing a breakdown of the wall separating the horrific truth of the abortion industry from media outlets.  Gosnell’s trial has brought to light the dark underside of the profit-driven and exploitative Big Abortion industry.  And as we continue to see them exposed for their lies and deceit, we look forward to a day when all are welcomed in life and protected in law.

Dr. Charmaine Yoest on Fox News’ Special Report

Tuesday, May 14th, 2013

Dr. Charmaine Yoest, president and CEO of AUL, appeared on Fox News’ Special Report to discuss the Kermit Gosnell verdict.

AUL Calls Gosnell Murder Conviction “a triumph of justice over the reality of infanticide – the logical conclusion of the abortion worldview”

Monday, May 13th, 2013

“In the Gosnell case, we’ve seen proof positive that the abortion industry operates as the red-light district of medicine, preying on the vulnerable and repeatedly victimizing the very women it claims to protect,”
said AUL’s Dr. Charmaine Yoest.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (05-13-13) – “The self-interested indifference of an unrepentant, unregulated, and unmonitored abortion industry stood front and center among the tragic events that led to the conviction of Kermit Gosnell,” said Americans United for Life President and CEO Dr. Charmaine Yoest. “The legacy of Gosnell’s trial will be Big Abortion’s collusion in bringing about America’s ‘red-light district of medicine” – today’s back-alley abortion clinics and renegade abortion profiteers. Consistently pro-life Americans must fight Big Abortion as they attempt to block commonsense attempts to regulate and monitor abortion clinics where we know that some women and girls have suffered and even died. I applaud the vedict and thank all those who worked so hard to bring Gosnell to justice. We must now protect women and infants from an abortion industry that steadfastly refuses to police itself. How many women, girls, and infants must die before the abortion industry is held accountable?”

“Both the National Abortion Federation and local Planned Parenthood knew of Gosnell’s grisly business, but they stayed silent. Meanwhile, Gosnell’s clinic went almost two decades without inspection as women and girls were victimize and subjected to dangerous and inhumane conditions,” noted Dr. Yoest. “This case underscores why abortion clinics must be subjected to medically appropriate standards and regular inspections. And Kermit Gosnell is not the aberration that abortion advocates claim.  Over the last three years at least 15 states have initiated investigations into the conditions and practices of abortion clinics.  These investigations were triggered by women’s deaths, reports of dangerous and unsanitary practices that exposed women to injuries and infections, and infants born alive following attempted abortions.

“How many more must die? Karnamaya Mongar died following her abortion in Gosnell’s clinic.  We have also mourned the loss of Jennifer Morbelli, Lou Anne Herron, Tonya Reaves, and many others at the hands of Big Abortion.  We promise to remember their names and to fight to protect future generations.”

“The abortion industry claims we need more ‘access’ to abortion – even as it is legal through all nine months of pregnancy today,” noted Dr. Yoest. “They consistently equate mere access to abortion with women’s healthcare.  But consider what we learned from the Gosnell trial, about the kind of ‘care’ provided by Big Abortion.”

The details of Gosnell’s 258 charges:

· Four counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of born-alive infants.  (He originally faced 7 counts, but 3 were dismissed at trial)

· One count of third-degree murder in the 2009 death of patient Karnamaya Mongar, a mother of four who had survived 20 years in a refugee camp in Bhutan before fleeing to the U.S.

· 24 counts of violating Pennsylvania’s Abortion Act by performing illegal third-trimester abortions

· 227 counts of violating the Pennsylvania Abortion Act’s 24-hour waiting period requirement and failing to properly counsel patients

· Racketeering

· Conspiracy

· Criminal solicitation

AUL has developed a unique expertise in the area of abortion clinic regulations. Drawing on our successful decade’s long defense of Arizona’s 1999 abortion clinic regulation law, AUL has developed two pieces of model legislation requiring regular inspections of abortion clinics and strict adherence to medically appropriate standards of patient care:

•   The “Abortion Patients’ Enhanced Safety Act” mandates that abortion clinics meet the same stringent patient care standards as other facilities performing other outpatient surgeries.

•   The “Women’s Health Protection Act” requires that abortion clinics meet minimum health and safety standards in a variety of areas including recordkeeping, staffing, sanitation, patient intake and testing, the abortion procedure itself, and post-operative care.

To see a video of AUL’s Dr. Yoest debate NARAL’s Ilyse Hogue on PBS’s “NewsHour” about Pro-Life Legislative Momentum in light of the Gosnell Trial, click here.

“Emergency Contraception”: What’s the big deal?

Saturday, May 11th, 2013

The media has been abuzz lately with conversations about “emergency contraception.”  The FDA has approved over-the-counter access to Plan B for 15-year-old girls.  The Obama Administration has decided to appeal a federal district judge’s decision demanding that Plan B be available to minors (without a downward limit).  And of course, there are currently at least 59 cases challenging the “HHS Mandate”—that portion of Obamacare that requires nearly all health insurance plans to cover, without co-pay, all drugs and devices labeled by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as “contraception,” including Plan B and ella.

And sparked by the media discussion, opinions start flying.  From editorials to friends’ facebook comments, the belief among the general population appears to be that “emergency contraception” prevents pregnancy—so that is good, right?  What’s the big deal?

The “big deal” is that “emergency contraception” can end the life of an already-developing human organism.  That means it is not always preventing a “pregnancy”—it is sometimes ending a human life.

It is scientifically established that a new, distinct human organism comes into existence during the process of fertilization.   Examples from scientific literature abound:

  • “The fusion of sperm and egg membranes initiates the life of a sexually reproducing organism.”
  • “The life cycle of mammals begins when a sperm enters an egg.”
  • “Fertilization is the process by which male and female haploid gametes (sperm and egg) unite to produce a genetically distinct individual.”
  • “The oviduct or Fallopian tube is the anatomical region where every new life begins in mammalian species. After a long journey, the spermatozoa meet the oocyte in the specific site of the oviduct named ampulla, and fertilization takes place.”
  • “Fertilization—the fusion of gametes to produce a new organism—is the culmination of a multitude of intricately regulated cellular processes.”

Even the government’s own definition confirms that life begins at fertilization.  According to the National Institutes of Health, “fertilization” is the process of union of two gametes (i.e., ovum and sperm) “whereby the somatic chromosome number is restored and the development of a new individual is initiated.”

Thus, a new individual human being is initiated at fertilization.  Of course, some drugs prevent fertilization from taking place, i.e., they prevent the sperm and egg from fusing.  However, if such drugs go further and prevent implantation in the womb, the drugs will cause the death of the already-existing human being by denying it the safety and nutrition supplied after implantation—safety and nutrition necessary for the human being to continue to live.

We refer to this as a “post-fertilization mechanism of action.”

The FDA’s labeling acknowledges that Plan B can prevent implantation of an already-developing human embryo.   Further, the FDA states on its website:

Plan B acts primarily by stopping the release of an egg from the ovary (ovulation).  It may prevent the union of sperm and egg (fertilization).  If fertilization does occur, Plan B may prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the womb (implantation).

The same explanation is provided by Duramed Pharmaceuticals, the manufacturer of Plan B One-Step.  Duramed states that Plan B One-Step “works primarily by”: 1) preventing ovulation; 2) possibly preventing fertilization by altering tubal transport of sperm and/or egg; 3) altering the endometrium, which may inhibit implantation.

By preventing implantation, Plan B is terminating the life of an already-developing human being. Plan B thus has a post-fertilization mechanism of action.

Similarly, studies confirm that the “emergency contraceptive” ella is harmful to a human embryo.  The FDA’s own labeling notes that ella may “affect implantation.”  A study funded by ella’s manufacturer, HRA Pharma, explains that ella can “impair implantation.”  Notably, at the FDA advisory panel meeting for ella, Dr. Scott Emerson, a professor of Biostatistics at the University of Washington and a panelist, raised the point that the low pregnancy rate for women who take ella four or five days after intercourse suggests that the drug must have an “abortifacient” quality.

So that’s the big deal.  “Emergency contraception” (such as Plan B and ella) can work after fertilization has occurred and prevent implantation, thereby ending the life of an already-developing human being.

By making Plan B available to minors, young girls may take the lives of their unborn children without parental involvement and without really knowing the effects of the drugs.  Allowing over-the-counter status for “emergency contraception” makes it easy for sexual predators to end the life of a tiny human being and cover up criminal activity.  And by coercing employers to provide insurance coverage of “emergency contraception” or face ruinous fines under Obamacare, those employers are being forced to pay for drugs that end the lives of human beings—regardless of their religious or conscientious objection.

We’d call that a “big deal” of unconstitutional proportions.

AUL Files Thirteenth Brief Supporting First Amendment Freedom of Conscience

Tuesday, May 7th, 2013

“Big Abortion and its political allies have moved from ‘choice’ to ‘coercion,’ punishing those who do not support their deadly agenda,” said AUL’s Dr. Charmaine Yoest.

WASHINGTON, D.C. (05-07-13) –Americans United for Life today filed its thirteenth amicus curiae brief in a legal challenge to Obamacare and in defense of freedom of conscience. In our brief filed in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, AUL argues that the Obama Administration’s “HHS Mandate”—which forces many employers to provide insurance coverage for life-ending drugs and devices without regard to the employers’ consciences or religious beliefs—violates the First Amendment freedom of conscience.

“Big Abortion and its political allies have moved from ‘choice’ to ‘coercion, punishing those who do not support their deadly agenda,” observed AUL President and CEO Charmaine Yoest. “The Obama Administration is using the implementation of the Affordable Care Act to force compliance with its radical, pro-abortion agenda. This is the liberty issue of our day, as American employers face threats of ruinous fines if they do not throw aside their beliefs in support of the abortion lobby.”

AUL’s brief was filed in Gilardi v. Sebelius, a case filed by the companies Fresh Unlimited, Inc. and Freshway Logistics, Inc., and their owners Francis Gilardi and Philip Gilardi. The Gilardis believe that actions intended to terminate innocent human life through abortion are in direct and serious violation of their faith, and they operate their businesses according to the values of their Catholic faith.

Previously, a federal district court in D.C. denied the Gilardis’ request for a preliminary injunction, which would have barred enforcement of the HHS Mandate against them and their businesses. The plaintiffs appealed to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which subsequently enjoined enforcement of the mandate against the Gilardis while it considers this appeal.

AUL’s brief, available here, demonstrates that the life of a new human being begins at fertilization (conception), that “emergency contraception” has a post-fertilization effect that can prevent a new human being from implanting in the uterus, and that forcing employers to provide coverage for such drugs violates their constitutionally protected freedom of conscience.

The brief was filed on behalf of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Christian Medical Association, Catholic Medical Association, National Catholic Bioethics Center, Physicians for Life, and National Association of Pro Life Nurses.

For more information on life-affirming healthcare, visit AUL’s unique project, Real Healthcare Respects Life, click here.

Video: Dr. Charmaine Yoest on FOX News

Wednesday, May 1st, 2013

Dr. Charmaine Yoest recently appeared on FOX News to discuss Kermit Gosnell and abortion clinic regulations.